In 2018, the chairperson of Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (Nissan), Carlos Ghosn, was arrested for alleged misconduct and criminal offences related to underreporting remuneration and misrepresenting annual disclosures. Detailed investigations revealed similar misrepresentations by the company's chief executive officer (CEO) Hiroto Saikawa, who was forced to resign. The actions of senior officials left a deep stain on Nissan's reputation, causing investors to question the effect of corporate governance at Nissan-and by extension, at similar companies across Japan and the world. As details of the scandal unfolded, Nissan suffered negative public repercussions. Its share-based incentive systems, excessive focus on profitability, and cost-cutting measures had caused deviations from normal risk management procedures, resulting in the production of poor-quality vehicles and thus vehicle recalls. Consumer trust in the company dropped, as did sales and profitability figures, with a continuous fall in the company's stock. The company's new CEO and board of directors were left to make amends for the company's future. They needed to determine how to strengthen the company's leadership and governance structure as they worked to make Nissan sustainable and profitable once again. Should they adopt a typical Japanese model of corporate governance, or would a model from elsewhere be more suitable? Nisha Kohli is affiliated with Temple University Japan. Ajai Gaur is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.

【書誌情報】

ページ数：16ページ

サイズ：A4

商品番号：HBSP-W20498

発行日：2020/6/11

登録日：2021/2/19